AgorasOBSERVATORY · OMNI 58 + ERC-20

Cohort flow Sankey

every transfer aggregated by sender → receiver display cohort, full chain history
Loading flow graph…

Flow matrix

pairwise volume between display cohorts (heat = AGRS volume)
Loading matrix…

Top flow corridors

largest sender-cohort → receiver-cohort pairs (≥ 0.05% of total volume)
Loading…

Net cohort flow over time

positive = cohort accumulating · negative = cohort distributing · monthly buckets
Loading…

Supply velocity

monthly volume / circulating supply — high values = active turnover
Loading…

Top flow hubs

wallets with the largest aggregate flow — network centrality leaders
Loading…
GPU graph analytics

Wallet behavioural map

Node2Vec embedding (16-dim, GPU) → UMAP 2D projection. Proximity = similar token-flow patterns, not proven coordination.
Wallet embedding not yet computed

Network influence (PageRank)

Weighted directed PageRank on the full transfer graph. Higher score = more value flow passes through this wallet.
Loading…

Personalised propagation

Personalised PageRank from each anchor cohort. Cohort shares = where the recursive influence concentrates, NOT where direct transfers settled.
Loading…

Discovered wallet communities

Louvain modularity clustering on the undirected weighted transfer graph. High internal volume = probable co-control, but not definitive.
Loading…
methodologyNode2Vec walks the transfer graph 5 times per node (12-step biased random walks), trains 16-d SkipGram embeddings on GPU, and projects to 2D with UMAP. Louvain optimises modularity over the symmetrised weighted graph. Personalised PageRank uses α = 0.85 with the anchor cohort as the teleportation distribution. All three are heuristics that surface hypotheses about co-flow patterns; none of them prove ownership, coordination, or direct token movement.